Quote:Its all to do with the way wood moves. Quatered boards will move less over their width than tangentally sawn timber, this is because the wood shrinks less radially to the center of the trunk than it does when at rightangles.
Having the trunk sawn through & through will give you crown cut boards at the top & bottom and quatered ones near the center. If you ask the sawyer to cut all the trunk for quatered timber there will be a lot of waste and it takes a lot longer so the cost will go up.
Jason
Thanks for that.
I'm still confused...!!
I can have the timber quarter sawn - benefit being that it will be more stable and I will have more chance of being able to use the timber. Down side is that there's more waste (not really a big concern for me) and that it will take longer to mill - hence cost more.
If I have the timber cut through and through then about a quarter of the timber will be 'quarter sawn' with the rest being crown cut. The upside of this is that there's less waste and it's cheaper to mill. The downside is that the crown cut timber is more likely to warp and be less stable, so it may end up being firewood.
To me the additional cost of milling isn't a major concern - my main priority is getting wood as stable as possible from the tree, especially given the fact that it will be drying in my garden rather than in a timber yard / kiln dried.
From the research I've done and knowledge I have (albeit limited!) I thought that quarter sawn would be the best option for me on this basis for the two main sections of the tree trunk. The rest I will have sawn through and through, but I thought that the trunks would get the most stable wood through quarter sawing.
The last few posts have confused me a bit and now I'm not sure what I'm best to do if:
- i am not concerned about increased waste
- i am not concerned about higher milling costs
- i want boards to be as stable as possible for decking - 30mm x 90mm.
Maybe it's just that there isn't one answer?!