Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Welcome To Ask The Trades!
Apr 7th, 2026, 12:00am
Quote: One way to stop a runaway horse is to bet on him - Jeffrey Bernard


Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Cooker circuit (Read 12771 times)
Rookie
GDPR opt-out









Cooker circuit
May 19th, 2009, 9:16pm
 
Hi, I want to install a cooker circuit feeding two cookers one of 2.8kw and one of 4.6kw. I have done the initial sums and come up with a cable size of 6mm. However the cable is 15mts long from the consumer unit to the cooker switch, is bunched with two other cables for about 8mts and runs on its own inside an insulated stud wall of about six feet long. It is a modern consumer unit with mcb's. I have used the correction factors and come up with an answer of the circuit requiring a 25mm cable. I think I am going wrong somewhere in my maths or at least I hope I am. Could somebody please put me right with the details of coming to the correct answer.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 19th, 2009, 10:25pm by Rookie »  
 
IP Logged
 
Zambezi
GDPR opt-out









Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #1 - May 20th, 2009, 7:53am
 
Have you applied diversity to the cookers? (assuming they are being used in a domestic environment).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
dingbat
Trade Member
*****
Offline

How hard can it be?
Posts: 2822


Total Thanks: 2
For This Post: 0


Gender: male

Trade: Electrician

Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #2 - May 20th, 2009, 9:53am
 
As well as diversity you could also apply the principal of reg 433.3.1 (ii), if the cooker is an entirely resistive load, meaning that you would not have to base the cable rating on the protective device overload rating, as overload protection would not be relevant.

(In this case, the full load of 20A for the largest cooker would safely be carried by a 6 sq mm cable installed to method #103)

The fuse/cb would still afford fault protection if the Zs was low enough.

(I'm not suggesting this as a normal solution, even though it is within the regs, because too few installers actually understand this approach and it doesn't provide allowance for future changes to load characteristics. In this case, however, I doubt you'd have a problem.)
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 20th, 2009, 1:25pm by dingbat »  
Thank User For This Post View members image gallery  
IP Logged
 
Y3
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #3 - May 20th, 2009, 10:50pm
 
dingbat wrote on May 20th, 2009, 9:53am:
As well as diversity you could also apply the principal of reg 433.3.1 (ii), if the cooker is an entirely resistive load, meaning that you would not have to base the cable rating on the protective device overload rating, as overload protection would not be relevant.


I dont quite understand what you mean Ding, could you put it in my language please   Grin

Why isnt overload relevant on a purely resistive load but is on a load that isnt purely resistive?     Huh
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
dingbat
Trade Member
*****
Offline

How hard can it be?
Posts: 2822


Total Thanks: 2
For This Post: 0


Gender: male

Trade: Electrician

Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #4 - May 21st, 2009, 7:16am
 
Carl,

a purely resistive load is, effectively, nothing more than a piece of conductor (unlike, say, a motor). The impedance of such a load is made up almost entirely of the simple resistance of that conductor.

Such a load could fail in short circuit or earth fault, or go open circuit, but is incapable of creating an overload.

So, in this case, the 20A (full) resistive load would easily be carried by a 6 sq mm cable at #103, with no risk of overload and therefore, no need to provide overload protection, but the circuit could be protected against fault currents by a 32A cb, simply by meeting the Zs limit for that breaker.

(But, as I've already stated, this would be something of a last resort in most circumstances.)
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 21st, 2009, 7:17am by dingbat »  
Thank User For This Post View members image gallery  
IP Logged
 
Y3
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #5 - May 21st, 2009, 7:27pm
 
dingbat wrote on May 21st, 2009, 7:16am:
Carl,

a purely resistive load is, effectively, nothing more than a piece of conductor (unlike, say, a motor). The impedance of such a load is made up almost entirely of the simple resistance of that conductor.



The way you explain it has such elegance  Grin  joke!

Thanx for that, I understand! The description that you give sounds similar to describing what a fuse is.

Back to top
« Last Edit: May 21st, 2009, 7:27pm by cosbycarl »  
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
Rookie
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #6 - May 21st, 2009, 9:08pm
 
Thanks Guys. I have installed the circuit, livened it up and all testing ok including the Zs. I was going to use an rcbo but have saved a few quid by using a mcb. As an aside the board is a Hager and the few wholesalers  that I went in to didn't stock Hager fuses. Luckily the board had a spare 32a mcb anyway. Could I have used other makes of fuses or is this not good practice?
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
Y3
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #7 - May 21st, 2009, 9:45pm
 
Does the cooker switch have a socket incorporated within it? If so, then you should have used an RCBO for 30mA protection, as required by the regs for sockets rated less than 20a for use by unskilled people and portable equipment that can be used outside.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 21st, 2009, 9:46pm by cosbycarl »  
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
Lectrician
Administrator
Trade Member
Author
*****
Offline

Ask The Trades
Posts: 8815


Total Thanks: 109
For This Post: 0


Braunton, North Devon, United Kingdom
Braunton, North Devon
United Kingdom

Gender: male

Trade: Electrician



Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #8 - May 21st, 2009, 9:49pm
 
Or indeed if the cable is buried in the buildings fabric in a tradional fashion.
Back to top
 

Need to post a picture? Click HERE for info!
Thank User For This Post WWW View members image gallery  
IP Logged
 
Rookie
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #9 - May 21st, 2009, 10:15pm
 
No socket outlet incorporated. Am I still ok? I could fit an rcbo to cover any possibility that the switch might one day get changed to a switch with socket outlet.
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
Y3
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #10 - May 21st, 2009, 11:00pm
 
As Lec says, above, if the circuit is buried within the fabric of the building less than 50mm and not protected by an earthed metallic covering then an RCBO will be needed.
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
dingbat
Trade Member
*****
Offline

How hard can it be?
Posts: 2822


Total Thanks: 2
For This Post: 0


Gender: male

Trade: Electrician

Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #11 - May 22nd, 2009, 7:18am
 
Quote:
Does the cooker switch have a socket incorporated within it?


There's yet another of those anachronistic (long word there for Carl!  Grin) practices.

Why on earth do they still make and sell an item of switchgear that dates from The Ark?

If this is such a good idea, why not manufacture shower switches with a built in fcu for, say, an extractor fan? Or why not build in a socket outlet on the front of a consumer unit? Or make a combined light switch and smoke alarm test button? Grin Grin Grin

Any more bright ideas out there?
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post View members image gallery  
IP Logged
 
Zambezi
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #12 - May 22nd, 2009, 9:01am
 
I am off to the patent office....
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
dingbat
Trade Member
*****
Offline

How hard can it be?
Posts: 2822


Total Thanks: 2
For This Post: 0


Gender: male

Trade: Electrician

Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #13 - May 22nd, 2009, 10:35am
 
I've got it.

A single phase DB, with a bit of dado trunking underneath, incorporating socket-outlets, telephone socket, aerial socket, doorbell receiver and sounder, intruder alarm panel and controller for whole-house sound and vision.

Now, all we do is market this as a 'rewire in a box' and we'll make gazillions!  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post View members image gallery  
IP Logged
 
Zambezi
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #14 - May 22nd, 2009, 10:49am
 
dingbat wrote on May 22nd, 2009, 10:35am:
I've got it.

A single phase DB, with a bit of dado trunking underneath, incorporating socket-outlets, telephone socket, aerial socket, doorbell receiver and sounder, intruder alarm panel and controller for whole-house sound and vision.

Now, all we do is market this as a 'rewire in a box' and we'll make gazillions!  Grin Grin Grin

I have just got back from the patent office, now I have to go again...
Back to top
 
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
Y3
Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #15 - May 22nd, 2009, 7:20pm
 
dingbat wrote on May 22nd, 2009, 7:18am:
anachronistic (long word there for Carl!  Grin) practices.


That is a long and unheard of word for me, for most people I think   Shocked

dingbat wrote on May 22nd, 2009, 7:18am:
Why on earth do they still make and sell an item of switchgear that dates from The Ark?


They are good when the kitchen is tiny and there isnt much work top, say a 300 base unit with a bit of work top, where a cooker and fridge freezer is positioned either side of it. A cooker switch with integral socket comes in handy then, just so a kettle or toaster can make use of the 300mm wide work top. You know how small council kitchens can be, but on the other hand they can also be massive, ive seen a few!

dingbat wrote on May 22nd, 2009, 7:18am:
If this is such a good idea, why not manufacture shower switches with a built in fcu for, say, an extractor fan? Or why not build in a socket outlet on the front of a consumer unit? Or make a combined light switch and smoke alarm test button? Grin Grin Grin

Any more bright ideas out there?


Somebody stop him, ive never seen Ding get this excited?   Grin
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2009, 7:22pm by cosbycarl »  
Thank User For This Post  
IP Logged
 
Lectrician
Administrator
Trade Member
Author
*****
Offline

Ask The Trades
Posts: 8815


Total Thanks: 109
For This Post: 0


Braunton, North Devon, United Kingdom
Braunton, North Devon
United Kingdom

Gender: male

Trade: Electrician



Re: Cooker circuit
Reply #16 - May 22nd, 2009, 8:29pm
 
TBH I never fit the cooker isolators with a socket.  I too see them as 'granny-ish'.
Back to top
 

Need to post a picture? Click HERE for info!
Thank User For This Post WWW View members image gallery  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print