Ask The Trades - Sparky Section on AT Versus SF

rabbit_rabbit

GDPR opt-out

Sparky Section on AT Versus SF
Dec 9^th, 2004, 9:16pm

Tiz interesting to note the folowng statsa -

ATT Electrical Forum Postings = 10,306 (as I write)

SF Electrical Forum Postings = 29,645 (As I write).

How long has ATT and SF been going?

Eat ya heart out SF we will be catching ya soon.

Well Done SS!

RR

PS. Prospective adverstiser on ATT - think carefully now where would YOU invest YOUR future?

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbit_rabbit GDPR opt-out	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #1 - Dec 9^th, 2004, 9:18pm OK put it another way - Who has more Rabbit that Sainsbury's? HandyMac that's who.
Back to top	IP Logged

The_Trician Trade Member Offline Posts: 7721 Total Thanks: 8 For This Post: 0 Gender: Trade: Electrician	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #2 - Dec 9^th, 2004, 10:19pm TT
Back to top	Thats the trouble with a colostomy - you can never find the shoes to match the bag....... IP Logged

LSpark Global Moderator Trade Member Author Offline Posts: 8069 Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0 London, UK United Kingdom Gender: Trade: Electrician	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #3 - Dec 10^th, 2004, 12:42am omg wtf fgs ffs omfg etc.... Quality not Quantity Raymondo
Back to top	« Last Edit: Dec 10^th, 2004, 12:43am by LSpark » IP Logged

HM Super Member Offline Chief Turd Polisher Posts: 5072 Total Thanks: 0 For This Post: 0 Gender:	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #4 - Dec 10^th, 2004, 6:51am [quote author=L.Spark link=1102626991/0#3 date=1102639377]Quality not Quantity Raymondo [/quote] Yeah well, I have broad shoulders. And that comment of yours could be very hurtful to ray - I understand he's a bit short on the quantity department...... HM
Back to top	If you aren't always sure of the right answer don't take up a career in the bomb squad IP Logged

rabbit_rabbit GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 0 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #5 - Dec 10^th, 2004, 6:55am Ya cheeky fecker, OK my shoulders might not be to wide but I make up for it in other 'quarters'. RR
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbit_rabbit GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 0 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #6 - Dec 10^th, 2004, 8:17am OOOeerrr SF server crashed this morning (08:14). I see they use Apache Tomcat ver 4.1.24 - it did a client side dump! Must have been my last posting To Miss Whoever about test kit for her boyfriend RR
Back to top	IP Logged

Stoday GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 0 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #7 - Dec 11^th, 2004, 11:50pm [quote author=rabbit_rabbit link=1102626991/0#0 date=1102626991] ATT Electrical Forum Postings = 10,306 (as I write) SF Electrical Forum Postings = 29,645 (As I write). [/quote] DIYnob Electrical Forum Postings = 29,620 TT Electrical Forum Postings = 308
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbit_rabbit GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 0 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #8 - Dec 12^th, 2004, 12:18am lol Stods - Touche RR
Back to top	IP Logged

supersparky Administrator Trade Member Author Offline Posts: 6097 Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0 Gender: Trade: Electrician	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #9 - Dec 12^th, 2004, 1:12am whats insulting is diynob has been going since 2000 lmao ss
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbit_rabbit GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #10 - Dec 12^th, 2004, 8:57am At that last posting extrapolatest ATT to having 148,100 postings within the same time frame. RR
Back to top	IP Logged

Stoday GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #11 - Dec 12^th, 2004, 9:43am You used linear extrapolation, rabbit. Isn't exponential extrapolation more appropriate?
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbit_rabbit

GDPR opt-out

Total Thanks: 3
For This Post: 0

Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF
Reply #12 - Dec 12^th, 2004, 10:02am

Depends Stods. Yes I did use linear true.

It can only be exponential if the membership growth rate is exponential . I don't have that data and if one does an extrapolation, over a given period of time, to determine membership rates this would be insufficient to determine whether it is linear or exponential.

So linear is probably more accurate Stods.

Herein ends todays lesson. You can go home (to TT) now.

RR

Back to top

IP Logged

Stoday GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #13 - Dec 13^th, 2004, 8:11am On second thoughts maybe neither linear nor exponential growth is appropriate. When Fibonacci investigated the growth rate of rabbit populations he finished up with the well-known Fibonacci series - 1; 1; 2; 3; 5; 8; 13; 21 etc. Perhaps that should be the extrapolation base.
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbit_rabbit GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #14 - Dec 13^th, 2004, 8:50am Ha Ha (another yawn) to be accurate Fibonacci discovered this series when investigating the growth paterns of fir cones Stodgy. RR
Back to top	IP Logged

Stoday GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #15 - Dec 13^th, 2004, 11:50am Another history according to rabbit, as usual differing from whatever you read in books. http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat.html#Rabbits According to this page on the University of Surrey's web site, rabbits was the original 1202 Fibonacci problem.
Back to top	IP Logged

Stoday GDPR opt-out Total Thanks: 3 For This Post: 0	Re: Sparky Section on AT Versus SF Reply #16 - Dec 13^th, 2004, 12:02pm Give rabbit his due, he was almost right. After finding his series by studying rabbit theory, Fibonacci went on to show that it also applied to fir cones. Mandelbrot took the fir cone issue a lot further & developed fractal geometry. (don't ask, rabbit, you won't understand).
Back to top	IP Logged