Joiner
|
Since whenever.
And I've never been Fensa approved, nor would I ever seek it, for three reasons:
1. Working on old properties the work is usually done under Conservation (especially if Listed or Article 4) and the work (method, design and materials) has therefore to be approved by the CO, before, during and on completion before it's signed off.
2. If within a conservation area and retaining PDR (no Article 4) then the work will be done under notice; surveyed by the BCO prior to start and inspected by them on completion.
3. Having worked with and for Fensa registered window fitters my first-hand experience is that Fensa is a licence for cowboys (even those with otherwise excellent woodworking skills) to get away with murder and it's something I wouldn't associate myself with. It's like the various trade "guilds" and "federations", if you can pay the entrance money and do the job on the day their guy comes to check you're in. It's a joke and has been since inception. Classing it in the same category as the gas or electrical regulatory bodies is an insult to them.
We've got a guy who's just started operating locally who's touting himself as a "conservation expert" and has targeted conservation areas. An ex-director of a upvc company, he's Fensa registered and fitting timber windows. He's "started to come to the notice" of local COs having fitted totally inappropriate windows which the customers, who only realised what was happening when the windows were in, had taken his word for as being right. He's done a lot of damage and, by undercutting the established guys (who quoted to do the work properly), has done them a lot of harm as well. (I'll mention that that doesn't include me, with a full order book until the middle of August.)
My work is inspected at every significant point in the process and signed off by an objective, independent party. Self-regulation is neither objective nor independent, which is why it's not for me.
|